Wealth shown to scale

当财富变成刻度

scroll

$1,000

$63,179 (美国家庭年收入中位数)

$100万

$10亿

$1390亿 世界首富杰夫·贝索斯的财富

$8千万
Jeff is so wealthy, that it is quite literally unimaginable.
世界首富,亚马逊创始人杰夫不是富有,而是你无法想象地富有
We rarely see wealth inequality represented to scale. This is part of the reason Americans consistently under-estimate the relative wealth of the super rich.
我们从未用刻度尺来理解过社会的贫富差距。 难怪美国人总是低估那些大富豪们到底有多钱
Every 10 pixels you scroll is $5 million.
你滑过的每10个像素都代表着500万美元(1美元约等于7元人民币)
OK, we're coming up on the end now.
好的,我们总算要滑到底了

Lol, just kidding, we're about ⅓ of the way. Keep scrolling, there's more to see.

呵呵,然而并不是,才刚刚 ⅓ 呢。继续滑,后面有惊喜~

Let's put this wealth in perspective by comparing it to some familiar things.
这么多钱完全没有概念?那我们来比较比较
All the money you will ever earn in your entire life from the day you are born until the day you die (about $1.7 million)
从出生到死去,你一生大概能赚这么多的钱(约$170万)
Annual cost of health care for a family of four
一个四口之家一年的医疗总花费
Annual pay of amazon warehouse worker.
一名亚马逊仓库管理员的年收入
Annual cost to house every single homeless veteran.
收容每位流离失所的退役老兵的年花费
Annual cost of chemotherapy for all cancer patients ($9 billion)
每年所有癌症患者化疗的费用总和($90亿)
In 2018, Jeff Bezos made $9 billion in about 40 days.
然而在2018年, 杰夫每40天就能赚到$90亿

Even the fortunes of very rich people are dwarfed by the incomprehensible wealth of the 0.0001%.

一些所谓的富豪们的财富还不及杰夫的千分之一,他们在杰夫面前只能瑟瑟发抖

Wealth of Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon ($50 million)
高盛CEO苏德巍的财富($5000万)
Wealth of Beyoncé ($400 million)
著名歌手碧昂斯的财富($4亿)
Wealth of Apple CEO Tim Cook ($625 million)
苹果公司总裁蒂姆库克的财富($6.25亿)
Lifetime earnings of a doctor, on average ($6.7 million)
普通美国医生一生的收入($670万)
Lifetime earnings of a lawyer, on average ($4 million)
普通美国律师一生的收入($400万)
Lifetime earnings of a hedge fund manager, on average ($84 million)
普通对冲基金经理一生的收入($8400万)

These people may see themselves as fabulously rich, and often oppose policies aimed at reducing inequality.

这些人可能觉得他们非常有钱了,因此经常反对制定政策来促进财富平均

But many have not fully grasped the enormous gulf between themselves and the super rich.

但是他们从未深刻地领悟到,在顶级的富豪面前他们有多渺小

Canvas 1 Layer 1 马克·扎克伯格 ($82 billion 820亿) 马克 扎克伯格 ($820亿) $0 $20亿

We can have a world in which wealthy people exist, without handing nearly all money to the super rich.

然而,我们本可以把顶级富豪的财富合理分配,让世界上更多人变得富有

No single human needs or deserves this much wealth.

这世上没有任何一个人需要,或应拥有如此巨额的财富

美国最富有的400人($2.96万亿)

$80m 8千万
Jeff Bezos may be insanely rich, but it is a drop in the ocean compared to the combined wealth of his peers. The 400 richest Americans own about $3 trillion, which is more than the bottom 60% percent of Americans.
杰夫的确是难以置信地有钱,但这和他身处的圈子相比不过是沧海一粟。美国最富有的400人拥有约3万亿的财富,约等于美国底层60%人口的财富总和
400 people
400人
Bottom 60%
底层60%人口
(Scroll Down) 下滑
0.0%

A trillion dollars is such a large figure, that you might as well say "eleventy gajillion zillion dollars." So in this section, we will try to understand the scale of this figure by looking at what could be accomplished with various chunks of this wealth.

1万亿美元是个天文数字,我们也没有任何的概念。那不如让我们看看这么多钱可以做什么

As we proceed, try to keep in mind: all of this wealth is controlled by a group so small, that they could fit on a single 747 airplane—with 260 seats left over.

在我们开始之前,请记住这么巨额的财富竟然聚集在这么少人的手上。一架波音747的飞机装下他们绰绰有余,还有260个灰色空位

What could we do with 3% of this money?

这些钱的3%可以做什么呢?

3%

Test Every American for Coronavirus

给每个美国人提供新冠疫情的检验

As of this writing, testing in the United States falls far short of what is needed to re-open the economy. By some estimates, sufficiently ramping up testing to around 30 million tests per week would cost around $100 billion total, or about 3% of the wealth currently controlled by the 400 richest Americans.

目前,美国新冠的检测数远远达不到解除隔离的标准。据一些专家计算,每周进行3千万的检测需要1千亿美元,仅仅约等于最富有的400人手上财富的3%

3% 3%

Permanently Eradicate Malaria

永久消除疟疾

Malaria is one of the worst infectious diseases ever visited on mankind, possibly killing more people than any other infectious disease in history. In the 20th century alone, malaria killed more people than the Black Death.

Coronavirus has shown us all the horrors of living with a deadly disease. Sadly, for much of the world, this horror was a constant feature of daily life even before coronavirus.

疟疾是人类历史上最严重的传染病之一,致死人数是其他所有传染病致死人数的总和。仅在上个世纪丧生于此病的人数就比黑色病累计的还要多

冠状病毒给我们带来了前所未有的恐惧。然而令人难受的是,在世界上的诸多区域,这种灾难早在新冠之前就已经是他们的家常便饭了

2020年1-4月新冠死亡人数
(约200,000)
2020年1-4月疟疾死亡人数
(约135,000)
埃博拉历史累计死亡人数(约15,000)
These figures are even more shocking when you learn that malaria overwhelmingly kills children; around two-thirds of malaria deaths each year are children under five. That's around 285,000 children.
不仅如此,疟疾的主要死亡人群是儿童。2/3的死亡人口年龄在5岁以下,也就是285,000个孩子.
Children under five killed by malaria each year
死于疟疾的5岁以下儿童
(Scroll Down 下滑)
10

All of these deaths are preventable. Treating and preventing malaria is a well understood science, universally practiced in the developed world.

It is estimated that malaria could be globally eradicated by 2030 for a cost around $1.84 per at-risk person per year, or around $100 billion total. This would be around 3% of the wealth currently possessed by the 400 richest Americans.

所有的这些死亡是本可以避免的.在西方发达国家,科学家早已发现治疗和预防疟疾的方法

有关报告估计,只需要花费总共$1000亿美元,也就是每个易感人口身上花$1.84,就能在2030年前根除全球的疟疾。这也仅仅约等于最富有的400人手上财富的3%

Around 800 children will die of malaria today. A small group of super rich people could stop it for a sum of money so small that they would likely never even notice its absence. But they choose not to.

就在今天,又会有800个孩子死于疟疾。那些顶级的富豪完全可以用他们的微不足道的一点点财富来阻止这一切,但是他们没有这么做。

What could we do with 5% of this money?

这些钱的5%可以做什么呢?

5.7%

Lift every American out of poverty.

让所有美国人口脱贫

As of 2019, around 38 million Americans lived in poverty. If Americans in poverty were a state, they would be second largest by population. There are more Americans living in poverty than the entire population of Canada. There are likely millions more newly impoverished as a result of coronavirus, but those numbers are not fully known yet.
2019年,美国有3800万的贫困人口。这一数字超过美国人口第二大州的人口数,也超过加拿大的人偶综述。我们暂时还不知道,还有多少数以万计的人口会因为新冠重新陷入贫困

Population of US States compared to poverty, 2019

2019年红色贫困人口和各州人口数的对比

Every single person in America could be lifted above the poverty line with a one-time cash subsidy of around $10,000 per impoverished family (and about $7,000 for impoverished individuals). The total cost would be $170 billion, a little over 5% of the wealth currently controlled by 400 individuals.

如果给每个贫困家庭一次性发放10000美元的救助金(即每个贫困人口发放7000美元),每一个贫困人口都可以脱离贫困线。总花费预计1700亿美元,也就是最富有的400人手上财富的5%

It may seem counter intuitive that a one-time subsidy could have any lasting impact on chronic poverty. But one of the surprising truths about poverty is that it's fluid. Americans move in and out of poverty many times throughout their lives, and one good year can have a massive and long lasting effect.

也会你会觉得一次性的救助金无法改善长期的贫困。贫困是反复的,人们一生中在贫困线附近徘徊,一年好的光景可以影响数年。

A wealth of data now supports the idea that one-time cash transfers can permanently transform a local economy. Given a sudden windfall, people invest in their future. They go back to school, obtain transportation, pay for childcare, pay down debilitating debts, and do any number of things to improve their career prospects and financial future.

一次性的现金补助可以永久地改变地方经济。 有了这笔意外的收入,人们会投资规划。他们会去再教育,改善交通工具,增加育儿支出,偿还积累的债务等等事情,来帮助他们事业的发展和提升未来经济水平

In the US, for all of the people that escape poverty in any given year, about half stay out of poverty for at least five years afterwards. About a third are still out of poverty ten years later.

在美国每一年,所有脱贫的人中,有一半的人会保持脱贫五年。更会有1/3的人在十年后依然保持脱贫

This would not be a permanent fix for all Americans. Surely, some would quickly return to poverty, and others face debts so large that the subsidy would make little difference. But for tens of millions of Americans, this would be a life changing event. It would be a generation defining social program that reshapes our economy for decades to come.

对美国人来说,这不是一个长久之计。他们中的一些人可能会很快重陷贫困,或者负债大到填不满。但是对于更多的人来说,这将会改变他们的命运。这将会是改变我们未来数十年经济的跨时代工程

What could we do with 6% of this money?

这些钱的6%可以做什么呢?

6%

Refund 2018 taxes for all households earning under $80,000

为所有年收入低于$80,000的家庭免税

In 2018, the combined federal tax revenue among all US households earning under $80,000 per year was around $200 billion. This money—taken entirely from poor and middle class Americans—could be returned for a tiny fraction of the wealth controlled by the .0001%.

2018年,年收入低于$80,000的家庭为政府贡献了 2000亿的税收。这些从底层和中产阶级身上收到的税是富人阶级收入的九牛一毛.

What could we do with 8% of this money?

这些钱的8%可以做什么呢?

8%

Provide clean drinking water and toilet access to every human on earth.

给地球上的每一个人提供干净的饮用水和厕所

Around 844 million people have no access to clean water of any kind. About the same number have no access to a toilet or latrine of any kind, and therefore defecate in the open.

8亿4400万的人口无法获得干净的水源。也有相同数量的人口没有厕所,只能随处解决

No clean water

无干净水源

Contaminated water is a major source of disease, including cholera, dysentery, and typhoid. It is estimated that contaminated water kills about 829,000 people every year, making it one of the world's biggest killers. The cost to provide clean water and waste disposal for everyone on earth would be about $240 billion, or 8% of the wealth controlled by the 400 richest Americans.

不洁净的水源是疾病的主要来源,这其中包括霍乱、痢疾和伤寒。据估计,污染的水导致最严重的人口死亡,每年致死829,000人. 为每个人提供洁净的水源和污水处理需花费 $2400亿, 也就是最富有的400人手上财富的8%。

OK, now that we've established the scale of inequality in the United States, let's dare to dream a little bigger.
终于,我们在刻度的帮助下体会到了美国社会的分配不均,现在让我们大胆想象一下

What could we do with 40% of this money?

这些钱的40%可以做什么呢?

43%

Give $10,000 to every American household

给每个美国家庭发放 $10000

There are about 128 million households in the United States. To give each one $10,000 would cost $1.28 trillion, or about 43% of the wealth controlled by 400 Americans.
美国约有1亿2800万个家庭。如果给每个家庭发放1万美元需要1.28万亿美元,也就是最富有的400人手上财富的43%.

As Americans debate how and when to open the economy after coronavirus, we are frequently presented with a seemingly impossible choice between risking millions of lives and sliding into a great depression through a continued lock down. This is a repugnant lie.

The money to weather this storm while maintaining quarantine exists, it's just a matter of finding the political will to take it.

大家每天都在讨论该何时解除新冠的封锁,来避免过多人的死亡或封城太久会导致的经济衰退。然而这就是个谎言。

其实完全有钱,在保持封城的前提下抵抗经济衰退,只是看政府愿不愿意了。/p>

What could we do with 85% of this money?

这些钱的85%可以做什么呢?

These programs combined would completely transform our world. By redistributing this wealth, millions of lives would be saved. Billions would be rescued from poverty and disease. By inconveniencing just 400 people, the entire human race could advance to a new, unprecedented level of development.
所有的这些可以彻底改善我们的世界。如果这些财富被合理地重新分配,数以万计被贫困和疾病折磨的生命将被拯救。区区400人的微小让步,会推动整个人类社会进入一个新的阶段。
And all of them would still be billionaires afterwards.
而这400人还会仍然是亿万富翁
Is it really so radical to suggest that this is the right thing to do? Given the choice between millions of deaths, and slightly shrinking the fortunes of a few super rich people, how could anyone conclude that the death of millions is preferable?
我们为什么不早这么做呢?在数万的死亡和这些人一小部分财富之间,谁难道会选择前者么?

We cannot accept this level of inequality any longer.

我们无法忍受
财富如此不均